52 shared · 20 different
core competencies
Side-by-Side Comparison
Astronomers leads 5–0| Metric | Astronomers | Financial Quantitative Analysts |
|---|---|---|
| Risk Score | 28.9% | 32.8% |
| Risk Tier | Medium Risk | Medium Risk |
| Risk Percentile | 33th | 55th |
| Tasks at Risk (>50%) | 4 / 15 | 7 / 15 |
| Median Salary | $132,170 | $80,190 |
| Employment | 2K | 127K |
Skill Comparison
Sorted by largest difference
Protective Factors
Higher values indicate stronger protection against AI displacement
Astronomers
29%
total discount
Financial Quantitative Analysts
30%
total discount
Task Risk Comparison
Tasks sorted by AI automation risk — higher means more automatable
Astronomers
4 of 15 at riskFinancial Quantitative Analysts
7 of 15 at riskWage Comparison
Premium Head-to-Head Analysis
Displacement Timeline Comparison
Astronomers has a longer runway before significant displacement, projected 0 years later than Financial Quantitative Analysts.
Risk-Adjusted Salary
Salary weighted by displacement risk: salary × (1 − risk%)
Astronomers
$93,999
from $132,170
Financial Quantitative Analysts
$53,896
from $80,190
After adjusting for AI risk, Astronomers offers $40,104 more in risk-adjusted pay.
Transition Feasibility
Skill Overlap
Low overlap — significant retraining needed for transition
Unique to Astronomers
Unique to Financial
Combined Protection Strategy
Regardless of which path you choose, focus on these protective factors