54 shared · 7 different
core competencies
Side-by-Side Comparison
Grinding and Polishing Workers, Hand leads 4–1| Metric | Engine and Other Machine Assemblers | Grinding and Polishing Workers, Hand |
|---|---|---|
| Risk Score | 38.2% | 37.8% |
| Risk Tier | Medium Risk | Medium Risk |
| Risk Percentile | 76th | 75th |
| Tasks at Risk (>50%) | 8 / 12 | 6 / 15 |
| Median Salary | $52,540 | $41,690 |
| Employment | 38K | 12K |
Skill Comparison
Sorted by largest difference
Protective Factors
Higher values indicate stronger protection against AI displacement
Engine and Other Machine Assemblers
26%
total discount
Grinding and Polishing Workers, Hand
25%
total discount
Task Risk Comparison
Tasks sorted by AI automation risk — higher means more automatable
Engine and Other Machine Assemblers
8 of 12 at riskGrinding and Polishing Workers, Hand
6 of 15 at riskWage Comparison
Premium Head-to-Head Analysis
Displacement Timeline Comparison
Grinding and Polishing Workers, Hand has a longer runway before significant displacement, projected 0 years later than Engine and Other Machine Assemblers.
Risk-Adjusted Salary
Salary weighted by displacement risk: salary × (1 − risk%)
Engine and Other Machine Assemblers
$32,480
from $52,540
Grinding and Polishing Workers, Hand
$25,915
from $41,690
After adjusting for AI risk, Engine and Other Machine Assemblers offers $6,566 more in risk-adjusted pay.
Transition Feasibility
Skill Overlap
Low overlap — significant retraining needed for transition
Unique to Engine
Unique to Grinding
Combined Protection Strategy
Regardless of which path you choose, focus on these protective factors