64 shared · 27 different
core competencies
Side-by-Side Comparison
Helpers--Extraction Workers leads 4–1| Metric | Helpers--Extraction Workers | Continuous Mining Machine Operators |
|---|---|---|
| Risk Score | 27.9% | 34.3% |
| Risk Tier | Medium Risk | Medium Risk |
| Risk Percentile | 29th | 63th |
| Tasks at Risk (>50%) | 3 / 14 | 9 / 15 |
| Median Salary | $48,400 | $63,380 |
| Employment | 7K | 14K |
Skill Comparison
Sorted by largest difference
Protective Factors
Higher values indicate stronger protection against AI displacement
Helpers--Extraction Workers
30%
total discount
Continuous Mining Machine Operators
28%
total discount
Task Risk Comparison
Tasks sorted by AI automation risk — higher means more automatable
Helpers--Extraction Workers
3 of 14 at riskContinuous Mining Machine Operators
9 of 15 at riskWage Comparison
Premium Head-to-Head Analysis
Displacement Timeline Comparison
Helpers--Extraction Workers has a longer runway before significant displacement, projected 0 years later than Continuous Mining Machine Operators.
Risk-Adjusted Salary
Salary weighted by displacement risk: salary × (1 − risk%)
Helpers--Extraction Workers
$34,872
from $48,400
Continuous Mining Machine Operators
$41,666
from $63,380
After adjusting for AI risk, Continuous Mining Machine Operators offers $6,794 more in risk-adjusted pay.
Transition Feasibility
Skill Overlap
Low overlap — significant retraining needed for transition
Unique to Helpers--Extraction
Unique to Continuous
Combined Protection Strategy
Regardless of which path you choose, focus on these protective factors