51 shared · 15 different
core competencies
Side-by-Side Comparison
Merchandise Displayers and Window Trimmers leads 4–1| Metric | Merchandise Displayers and Window Trimmers | Floral Designers |
|---|---|---|
| Risk Score | 19.5% | 31.2% |
| Risk Tier | Low Risk | Medium Risk |
| Risk Percentile | 5th | 46th |
| Tasks at Risk (>50%) | 6 / 15 | 4 / 15 |
| Median Salary | $37,350 | $36,120 |
| Employment | 192K | 40K |
Skill Comparison
Sorted by largest difference
Protective Factors
Higher values indicate stronger protection against AI displacement
Merchandise Displayers and Window Trimmers
31%
total discount
Floral Designers
29%
total discount
Task Risk Comparison
Tasks sorted by AI automation risk — higher means more automatable
Merchandise Displayers and Window Trimmers
6 of 15 at riskFloral Designers
4 of 15 at riskWage Comparison
Premium Head-to-Head Analysis
Displacement Timeline Comparison
Merchandise Displayers and Window Trimmers has a longer runway before significant displacement, projected 0 years later than Floral Designers.
Risk-Adjusted Salary
Salary weighted by displacement risk: salary × (1 − risk%)
Merchandise Displayers and Window Trimmers
$30,074
from $37,350
Floral Designers
$24,836
from $36,120
After adjusting for AI risk, Merchandise Displayers and Window Trimmers offers $5,238 more in risk-adjusted pay.
Transition Feasibility
Skill Overlap
Low overlap — significant retraining needed for transition
Unique to Merchandise
Unique to Floral
Combined Protection Strategy
Regardless of which path you choose, focus on these protective factors