50 shared · 11 different
core competencies
Side-by-Side Comparison
Tool Grinders, Filers, and Sharpeners leads 4–1| Metric | Motion Picture Projectionists | Tool Grinders, Filers, and Sharpeners |
|---|---|---|
| Risk Score | 44.2% | 38.5% |
| Risk Tier | Medium Risk | Medium Risk |
| Risk Percentile | 90th | 77th |
| Tasks at Risk (>50%) | 5 / 15 | 8 / 15 |
| Median Salary | $38,180 | $48,970 |
| Employment | 2K | 6K |
Skill Comparison
Sorted by largest difference
Protective Factors
Higher values indicate stronger protection against AI displacement
Motion Picture Projectionists
22%
total discount
Tool Grinders, Filers, and Sharpeners
27%
total discount
Task Risk Comparison
Tasks sorted by AI automation risk — higher means more automatable
Motion Picture Projectionists
5 of 15 at riskTool Grinders, Filers, and Sharpeners
8 of 15 at riskWage Comparison
Premium Head-to-Head Analysis
Displacement Timeline Comparison
Tool Grinders, Filers, and Sharpeners has a longer runway before significant displacement, projected 0 years later than Motion Picture Projectionists.
Risk-Adjusted Salary
Salary weighted by displacement risk: salary × (1 − risk%)
Motion Picture Projectionists
$21,304
from $38,180
Tool Grinders, Filers, and Sharpeners
$30,097
from $48,970
After adjusting for AI risk, Tool Grinders, Filers, and Sharpeners offers $8,793 more in risk-adjusted pay.
Transition Feasibility
Skill Overlap
Low overlap — significant retraining needed for transition
Unique to Motion
Unique to Tool
Combined Protection Strategy
Regardless of which path you choose, focus on these protective factors