37 shared · 6 different
core competencies
Side-by-Side Comparison
Precious Metal Workers leads 4–0| Metric | Precious Metal Workers | Gem and Diamond Workers |
|---|---|---|
| Risk Score | 35.1% | 36.8% |
| Risk Tier | Medium Risk | Medium Risk |
| Risk Percentile | 66th | 72th |
| Tasks at Risk (>50%) | 7 / 15 | 10 / 15 |
| Median Salary | $49,140 | $49,140 |
| Employment | 23K | 23K |
Skill Comparison
Sorted by largest difference
Protective Factors
Higher values indicate stronger protection against AI displacement
Precious Metal Workers
26%
total discount
Gem and Diamond Workers
25%
total discount
Task Risk Comparison
Tasks sorted by AI automation risk — higher means more automatable
Precious Metal Workers
7 of 15 at riskGem and Diamond Workers
10 of 15 at riskWage Comparison
Premium Head-to-Head Analysis
Displacement Timeline Comparison
Precious Metal Workers has a longer runway before significant displacement, projected 0 years later than Gem and Diamond Workers.
Risk-Adjusted Salary
Salary weighted by displacement risk: salary × (1 − risk%)
Precious Metal Workers
$31,912
from $49,140
Gem and Diamond Workers
$31,037
from $49,140
After adjusting for AI risk, Precious Metal Workers offers $875 more in risk-adjusted pay.
Transition Feasibility
Skill Overlap
Low overlap — significant retraining needed for transition
Unique to Precious
Unique to Gem
Combined Protection Strategy
Regardless of which path you choose, focus on these protective factors