63 shared · 38 different
core competencies
Side-by-Side Comparison
Hazardous Materials Removal Workers leads 3–2| Metric | Service Unit Operators, Oil, Gas, and Mining | Hazardous Materials Removal Workers |
|---|---|---|
| Risk Score | 23.7% | 22.1% |
| Risk Tier | Low Risk | Low Risk |
| Risk Percentile | 16th | 11th |
| Tasks at Risk (>50%) | 2 / 15 | 3 / 15 |
| Median Salary | $57,980 | $48,490 |
| Employment | 44K | 51K |
Skill Comparison
Sorted by largest difference
Protective Factors
Higher values indicate stronger protection against AI displacement
Service Unit Operators, Oil, Gas, and Mining
32%
total discount
Hazardous Materials Removal Workers
30%
total discount
Task Risk Comparison
Tasks sorted by AI automation risk — higher means more automatable
Service Unit Operators, Oil, Gas, and Mining
2 of 15 at riskHazardous Materials Removal Workers
3 of 15 at riskWage Comparison
Premium Head-to-Head Analysis
Displacement Timeline Comparison
Hazardous Materials Removal Workers has a longer runway before significant displacement, projected 0 years later than Service Unit Operators, Oil, Gas, and Mining.
Risk-Adjusted Salary
Salary weighted by displacement risk: salary × (1 − risk%)
Service Unit Operators, Oil, Gas, and Mining
$44,250
from $57,980
Hazardous Materials Removal Workers
$37,774
from $48,490
After adjusting for AI risk, Service Unit Operators, Oil, Gas, and Mining offers $6,477 more in risk-adjusted pay.
Transition Feasibility
Skill Overlap
Low overlap — significant retraining needed for transition
Unique to Service
Unique to Hazardous
Combined Protection Strategy
Regardless of which path you choose, focus on these protective factors