61 shared · 22 different
core competencies
Side-by-Side Comparison
Recreation Workers leads 3–2| Metric | Community Health Workers | Recreation Workers |
|---|---|---|
| Risk Score | 24.5% | 22.7% |
| Risk Tier | Low Risk | Low Risk |
| Risk Percentile | 18th | 13th |
| Tasks at Risk (>50%) | 3 / 15 | 4 / 15 |
| Median Salary | $51,030 | $35,380 |
| Employment | 61K | 310K |
Skill Comparison
Sorted by largest difference
Protective Factors
Higher values indicate stronger protection against AI displacement
Community Health Workers
36%
total discount
Recreation Workers
34%
total discount
Task Risk Comparison
Tasks sorted by AI automation risk — higher means more automatable
Community Health Workers
3 of 15 at riskRecreation Workers
4 of 15 at riskWage Comparison
Premium Head-to-Head Analysis
Displacement Timeline Comparison
Recreation Workers has a longer runway before significant displacement, projected 0 years later than Community Health Workers.
Risk-Adjusted Salary
Salary weighted by displacement risk: salary × (1 − risk%)
Community Health Workers
$38,512
from $51,030
Recreation Workers
$27,335
from $35,380
After adjusting for AI risk, Community Health Workers offers $11,178 more in risk-adjusted pay.
Transition Feasibility
Skill Overlap
Low overlap — significant retraining needed for transition
Unique to Community
Unique to Recreation
Combined Protection Strategy
Regardless of which path you choose, focus on these protective factors