41 shared · 11 different
core competencies
Side-by-Side Comparison
Engine and Other Machine Assemblers leads 5–0| Metric | Engine and Other Machine Assemblers | Machine Feeders and Offbearers |
|---|---|---|
| Risk Score | 38.2% | 51.3% |
| Risk Tier | Medium Risk | High Risk |
| Risk Percentile | 76th | 98th |
| Tasks at Risk (>50%) | 8 / 12 | 11 / 13 |
| Median Salary | $52,540 | $39,700 |
| Employment | 38K | 47K |
Skill Comparison
Sorted by largest difference
Protective Factors
Higher values indicate stronger protection against AI displacement
Engine and Other Machine Assemblers
26%
total discount
Machine Feeders and Offbearers
22%
total discount
Task Risk Comparison
Tasks sorted by AI automation risk — higher means more automatable
Engine and Other Machine Assemblers
8 of 12 at riskMachine Feeders and Offbearers
11 of 13 at riskWage Comparison
Premium Head-to-Head Analysis
Displacement Timeline Comparison
Engine and Other Machine Assemblers has a longer runway before significant displacement, projected 0 years later than Machine Feeders and Offbearers.
Risk-Adjusted Salary
Salary weighted by displacement risk: salary × (1 − risk%)
Engine and Other Machine Assemblers
$32,480
from $52,540
Machine Feeders and Offbearers
$19,350
from $39,700
After adjusting for AI risk, Engine and Other Machine Assemblers offers $13,130 more in risk-adjusted pay.
Transition Feasibility
Skill Overlap
Low overlap — significant retraining needed for transition
Unique to Engine
Unique to Machine
Combined Protection Strategy
Regardless of which path you choose, focus on these protective factors