49 shared · 23 different
core competencies
Side-by-Side Comparison
Film and Video Editors leads 5–0| Metric | Sound Engineering Technicians | Film and Video Editors |
|---|---|---|
| Risk Score | 36.0% | 35.0% |
| Risk Tier | Medium Risk | Medium Risk |
| Risk Percentile | 68th | 66th |
| Tasks at Risk (>50%) | 9 / 14 | 8 / 15 |
| Median Salary | $66,430 | $70,980 |
| Employment | 13K | 29K |
Skill Comparison
Sorted by largest difference
Protective Factors
Higher values indicate stronger protection against AI displacement
Sound Engineering Technicians
31%
total discount
Film and Video Editors
29%
total discount
Task Risk Comparison
Tasks sorted by AI automation risk — higher means more automatable
Sound Engineering Technicians
9 of 14 at riskFilm and Video Editors
8 of 15 at riskWage Comparison
Premium Head-to-Head Analysis
Displacement Timeline Comparison
Film and Video Editors has a longer runway before significant displacement, projected 0 years later than Sound Engineering Technicians.
Risk-Adjusted Salary
Salary weighted by displacement risk: salary × (1 − risk%)
Sound Engineering Technicians
$42,535
from $66,430
Film and Video Editors
$46,172
from $70,980
After adjusting for AI risk, Film and Video Editors offers $3,637 more in risk-adjusted pay.
Transition Feasibility
Skill Overlap
Low overlap — significant retraining needed for transition
Unique to Sound
Unique to Film
Combined Protection Strategy
Regardless of which path you choose, focus on these protective factors