42 shared · 12 different
core competencies
Side-by-Side Comparison
Structural Metal Fabricators and Fitters leads 4–1| Metric | Structural Metal Fabricators and Fitters | Engine and Other Machine Assemblers |
|---|---|---|
| Risk Score | 29.4% | 38.2% |
| Risk Tier | Medium Risk | Medium Risk |
| Risk Percentile | 35th | 76th |
| Tasks at Risk (>50%) | 6 / 15 | 8 / 12 |
| Median Salary | $49,900 | $52,540 |
| Employment | 53K | 38K |
Skill Comparison
Sorted by largest difference
Protective Factors
Higher values indicate stronger protection against AI displacement
Structural Metal Fabricators and Fitters
24%
total discount
Engine and Other Machine Assemblers
26%
total discount
Task Risk Comparison
Tasks sorted by AI automation risk — higher means more automatable
Structural Metal Fabricators and Fitters
6 of 15 at riskEngine and Other Machine Assemblers
8 of 12 at riskWage Comparison
Premium Head-to-Head Analysis
Displacement Timeline Comparison
Structural Metal Fabricators and Fitters has a longer runway before significant displacement, projected 0 years later than Engine and Other Machine Assemblers.
Risk-Adjusted Salary
Salary weighted by displacement risk: salary × (1 − risk%)
Structural Metal Fabricators and Fitters
$35,239
from $49,900
Engine and Other Machine Assemblers
$32,480
from $52,540
After adjusting for AI risk, Structural Metal Fabricators and Fitters offers $2,759 more in risk-adjusted pay.
Transition Feasibility
Skill Overlap
Low overlap — significant retraining needed for transition
Unique to Structural
Unique to Engine
Combined Protection Strategy
Regardless of which path you choose, focus on these protective factors