53 shared · 16 different
core competencies
Side-by-Side Comparison
Tire Repairers and Changers leads 4–1| Metric | Tire Repairers and Changers | Recycling and Reclamation Workers |
|---|---|---|
| Risk Score | 32.3% | 34.2% |
| Risk Tier | Medium Risk | Medium Risk |
| Risk Percentile | 52th | 63th |
| Tasks at Risk (>50%) | 2 / 15 | 5 / 15 |
| Median Salary | $37,120 | $38,820 |
| Employment | 107K | 277K |
Skill Comparison
Sorted by largest difference
Protective Factors
Higher values indicate stronger protection against AI displacement
Tire Repairers and Changers
27%
total discount
Recycling and Reclamation Workers
25%
total discount
Task Risk Comparison
Tasks sorted by AI automation risk — higher means more automatable
Tire Repairers and Changers
2 of 15 at riskRecycling and Reclamation Workers
5 of 15 at riskWage Comparison
Premium Head-to-Head Analysis
Displacement Timeline Comparison
Tire Repairers and Changers has a longer runway before significant displacement, projected 0 years later than Recycling and Reclamation Workers.
Risk-Adjusted Salary
Salary weighted by displacement risk: salary × (1 − risk%)
Tire Repairers and Changers
$25,138
from $37,120
Recycling and Reclamation Workers
$25,559
from $38,820
After adjusting for AI risk, Recycling and Reclamation Workers offers $421 more in risk-adjusted pay.
Transition Feasibility
Skill Overlap
Low overlap — significant retraining needed for transition
Unique to Tire
Unique to Recycling
Combined Protection Strategy
Regardless of which path you choose, focus on these protective factors