50 shared · 9 different
core competencies
Side-by-Side Comparison
Cooks, Institution and Cafeteria leads 5–0| Metric | Cooks, Institution and Cafeteria | Gaming Change Persons and Booth Cashiers |
|---|---|---|
| Risk Score | 39.8% | 59.1% |
| Risk Tier | Medium Risk | High Risk |
| Risk Percentile | 80th | 99th |
| Tasks at Risk (>50%) | 9 / 15 | 14 / 15 |
| Median Salary | $36,450 | $34,810 |
| Employment | 448K | 22K |
Skill Comparison
Sorted by largest difference
Protective Factors
Higher values indicate stronger protection against AI displacement
Cooks, Institution and Cafeteria
28%
total discount
Gaming Change Persons and Booth Cashiers
25%
total discount
Task Risk Comparison
Tasks sorted by AI automation risk — higher means more automatable
Cooks, Institution and Cafeteria
9 of 15 at riskGaming Change Persons and Booth Cashiers
14 of 15 at riskWage Comparison
Premium Head-to-Head Analysis
Displacement Timeline Comparison
Cooks, Institution and Cafeteria has a longer runway before significant displacement, projected 0 years later than Gaming Change Persons and Booth Cashiers.
Risk-Adjusted Salary
Salary weighted by displacement risk: salary × (1 − risk%)
Cooks, Institution and Cafeteria
$21,950
from $36,450
Gaming Change Persons and Booth Cashiers
$14,227
from $34,810
After adjusting for AI risk, Cooks, Institution and Cafeteria offers $7,723 more in risk-adjusted pay.
Transition Feasibility
Skill Overlap
Low overlap — significant retraining needed for transition
Unique to Cooks,
Unique to Gaming
Combined Protection Strategy
Regardless of which path you choose, focus on these protective factors