50 shared · 7 different
core competencies
Side-by-Side Comparison
Waiters and Waitresses leads 4–1| Metric | Cooks, Institution and Cafeteria | Waiters and Waitresses |
|---|---|---|
| Risk Score | 39.8% | 33.8% |
| Risk Tier | Medium Risk | Medium Risk |
| Risk Percentile | 80th | 61th |
| Tasks at Risk (>50%) | 9 / 15 | 5 / 15 |
| Median Salary | $36,450 | $33,760 |
| Employment | 448K | 2.3M |
Skill Comparison
Sorted by largest difference
Protective Factors
Higher values indicate stronger protection against AI displacement
Cooks, Institution and Cafeteria
28%
total discount
Waiters and Waitresses
28%
total discount
Task Risk Comparison
Tasks sorted by AI automation risk — higher means more automatable
Cooks, Institution and Cafeteria
9 of 15 at riskWaiters and Waitresses
5 of 15 at riskWage Comparison
Premium Head-to-Head Analysis
Displacement Timeline Comparison
Waiters and Waitresses has a longer runway before significant displacement, projected 0 years later than Cooks, Institution and Cafeteria.
Risk-Adjusted Salary
Salary weighted by displacement risk: salary × (1 − risk%)
Cooks, Institution and Cafeteria
$21,950
from $36,450
Waiters and Waitresses
$22,363
from $33,760
After adjusting for AI risk, Waiters and Waitresses offers $412 more in risk-adjusted pay.
Transition Feasibility
Skill Overlap
Low overlap — significant retraining needed for transition
Unique to Cooks,
Unique to Waiters
Combined Protection Strategy
Regardless of which path you choose, focus on these protective factors