56 shared · 24 different
core competencies
Side-by-Side Comparison
Correctional Officers and Jailers leads 5–0| Metric | Correctional Officers and Jailers | Umpires, Referees, and Other Sports Officials |
|---|---|---|
| Risk Score | 30.2% | 39.7% |
| Risk Tier | Medium Risk | Medium Risk |
| Risk Percentile | 40th | 80th |
| Tasks at Risk (>50%) | 7 / 15 | 10 / 15 |
| Median Salary | $57,970 | $38,820 |
| Employment | 365K | 15K |
Skill Comparison
Sorted by largest difference
Protective Factors
Higher values indicate stronger protection against AI displacement
Correctional Officers and Jailers
33%
total discount
Umpires, Referees, and Other Sports Officials
28%
total discount
Task Risk Comparison
Tasks sorted by AI automation risk — higher means more automatable
Correctional Officers and Jailers
7 of 15 at riskUmpires, Referees, and Other Sports Officials
10 of 15 at riskWage Comparison
Premium Head-to-Head Analysis
Displacement Timeline Comparison
Correctional Officers and Jailers has a longer runway before significant displacement, projected 0 years later than Umpires, Referees, and Other Sports Officials.
Risk-Adjusted Salary
Salary weighted by displacement risk: salary × (1 − risk%)
Correctional Officers and Jailers
$40,446
from $57,970
Umpires, Referees, and Other Sports Officials
$23,401
from $38,820
After adjusting for AI risk, Correctional Officers and Jailers offers $17,045 more in risk-adjusted pay.
Transition Feasibility
Skill Overlap
Low overlap — significant retraining needed for transition
Unique to Correctional
Unique to Umpires,
Combined Protection Strategy
Regardless of which path you choose, focus on these protective factors