26 shared · 11 different
core competencies
Side-by-Side Comparison
Laborers and Freight, Stock, and Material Movers, Hand leads 3–2| Metric | Laborers and Freight, Stock, and Material Movers, Hand | Machine Feeders and Offbearers |
|---|---|---|
| Risk Score | 45.3% | 51.3% |
| Risk Tier | Medium Risk | High Risk |
| Risk Percentile | 92th | 98th |
| Tasks at Risk (>50%) | 12 / 15 | 11 / 13 |
| Median Salary | $38,940 | $39,700 |
| Employment | 3M | 47K |
Skill Comparison
Sorted by largest difference
Protective Factors
Higher values indicate stronger protection against AI displacement
Laborers and Freight, Stock, and Material Movers, Hand
23%
total discount
Machine Feeders and Offbearers
22%
total discount
Task Risk Comparison
Tasks sorted by AI automation risk — higher means more automatable
Laborers and Freight, Stock, and Material Movers, Hand
12 of 15 at riskMachine Feeders and Offbearers
11 of 13 at riskWage Comparison
Premium Head-to-Head Analysis
Displacement Timeline Comparison
Laborers and Freight, Stock, and Material Movers, Hand has a longer runway before significant displacement, projected 0 years later than Machine Feeders and Offbearers.
Risk-Adjusted Salary
Salary weighted by displacement risk: salary × (1 − risk%)
Laborers and Freight, Stock, and Material Movers, Hand
$21,304
from $38,940
Machine Feeders and Offbearers
$19,350
from $39,700
After adjusting for AI risk, Laborers and Freight, Stock, and Material Movers, Hand offers $1,954 more in risk-adjusted pay.
Transition Feasibility
Skill Overlap
Low overlap — significant retraining needed for transition
Unique to Laborers
Unique to Machine
Combined Protection Strategy
Regardless of which path you choose, focus on these protective factors