Side-by-Side Comparison
Library Assistants, Clerical leads 4–1| Metric | Tellers | Library Assistants, Clerical |
|---|---|---|
| Risk Score | 53.3% | 47.2% |
| Risk Tier | High Risk | Medium Risk |
| Risk Percentile | 99th | 95th |
| Tasks at Risk (>50%) | 14 / 15 | 10 / 15 |
| Median Salary | $39,340 | $36,010 |
| Employment | 339K | 80K |
Skill Comparison
Sorted by largest difference
Protective Factors
Higher values indicate stronger protection against AI displacement
Tellers
29%
total discount
Library Assistants, Clerical
25%
total discount
Task Risk Comparison
Tasks sorted by AI automation risk — higher means more automatable
Tellers
14 of 15 at riskLibrary Assistants, Clerical
10 of 15 at riskWage Comparison
Premium Head-to-Head Analysis
Displacement Timeline Comparison
Library Assistants, Clerical has a longer runway before significant displacement, projected 0 years later than Tellers.
Risk-Adjusted Salary
Salary weighted by displacement risk: salary × (1 − risk%)
Tellers
$18,380
from $39,340
Library Assistants, Clerical
$19,028
from $36,010
After adjusting for AI risk, Library Assistants, Clerical offers $648 more in risk-adjusted pay.
Transition Feasibility
Skill Overlap
Low overlap — significant retraining needed for transition
Unique to Tellers
Unique to Library
Combined Protection Strategy
Regardless of which path you choose, focus on these protective factors